Kelton, D. F., et al. “The Efficacy of Intramammary Tilmicosin at Drying-Off, and Other Risk Factors for the Prevention of New Intramammary Infections During the Dry Period”. Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 85, no. 12, 2002, pp. 3250-9, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74413-5.

Genre

  • Journal Article
Contributors
Author: Kelton, D. F.
Author: DesCoteaux, L.
Author: Bagg, R.
Author: Dick, P.
Author: Duffield, T. F.
Author: Schukken, Y. H.
Author: Lissemore, K. D.
Author: Leslie, K. E.
Author: Dingwell, R. T.
Author: Keefe, Gregory P.
Date Issued
2002
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of an intramammary infusion, containing tilmicosin phosphate, to an infusion of a negative control intramammary placebo for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period. Cows were enrolled from 24 dairy herds from three geographical regions of Canada. Data from 248 cows and 938 bacteriologically negative quarters at drying-off are summarized. Overall, the rate of new IMI during the dry period was 16.7% of quarters. The new infection rates for quarters that received intramammary tilmicosin compared with the intramammary placebo were 14.4 and 19.4%, respectively. The majority of new IMI was caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci (49%) and environmental streptococcal organisms (26.8%). The probability for quarters to develop new IMI in the dry period was significantly increased when cows had higher milk production before drying-off (P = 0.04), when cows had longer dry periods (P = 0.02), and when dry cows were housed in tie-stall barns (P = 0.002). Higher parity cows and those that had a linear score somatic cell count (SCC) above 4 on the last DHI test were also at increased risk for new IMI (P < 0.10). Administration of intramammary tilmicosin appears to be an efficacious therapy for prevention of new IMI; however, there is currently no approved intramammary formulation of this product available. Use of blanket dry cow antibiotic therapy compared to selective dry cow therapy, as well as the importance of identifying risk factors and managing the environment of dry cows are discussed.

Note

University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada. rdingwell@vet.k-state.edu

United States

LR: 20061115; PUBM: Print; JID: 2985126R; 0 (Anti-Bacterial Agents); 0 (Macrolides); 0 (Placebos); 108050-54-0 (tilmicosin); 1401-69-0 (Tylosin); ppublish

Source type: Electronic(1)

Language

  • English

Subjects

  • Parity
  • Escherichia coli Infections/prevention & control
  • Mammary Glands, Animal/drug effects/microbiology
  • Canada
  • Placebos
  • Lactation
  • Mastitis, Bovine/microbiology/prevention & control
  • Macrolides
  • animals
  • Logistic Models
  • risk factors
  • cattle
  • Tylosin/administration & dosage/analogs & derivatives/therapeutic use
  • Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control
  • Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control
  • Female
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage/therapeutic use
  • Cell Count
  • Milk/cytology
  • Klebsiella Infections/prevention & control
Page range
3250-3259
Host Title
Journal of Dairy Science
Host Abbreviated Title
J.Dairy Sci.
Volume
85
Issue
12
ISSN
0022-0302

Department