Cherry, Elizabeth M., et al. “Shock-Induced Termination of Reentrant Cardiac Arrhythmias: Comparing Monophasic and Biphasic Shock Protocols”. Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.), vol. 23, no. 4, 2013, pp. 043119-, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4829632.

Genre

  • Journal Article
Contributors
Author: Cherry, Elizabeth M.
Author: Grigoriev, Roman O.
Author: Fenton, Flavio H.
Author: Otani, Niels F.
Author: Elorza, Jorge
Author: Bragard, Jean
Author: Gilmour, Robert F.
Author: Simic, Ana
Date Issued
2013
Abstract

In this article, we compare quantitatively the efficiency of three different protocols commonly used in commercial defibrillators. These are based on monophasic and both symmetric and asymmetric biphasic shocks. A numerical one-dimensional model of cardiac tissue using the bidomain formulation is used in order to test the different protocols. In particular, we performed a total of 4.8 × 10(6) simulations by varying shock waveform, shock energy, initial conditions, and heterogeneity in internal electrical conductivity. Whenever the shock successfully removed the reentrant dynamics in the tissue, we classified the mechanism. The analysis of the numerical data shows that biphasic shocks are significantly more efficient (by about 25%) than the corresponding monophasic ones. We determine that the increase in efficiency of the biphasic shocks can be explained by the higher proportion of newly excited tissue through the mechanism of direct activation.

Note

Type of work: journal article

Date issued: 2013 Dec

Record creation date:

Status: imported

Language

  • English
Page range
043119-043119-13
Host Title
Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
Host Abbreviated Title
Chaos
Volume
23
Issue
4
ISSN
1054-1500
1089-7682
PMID Identifier
24387558
PubMed Central Identifier
PMC3843767

Department